Quoting Philip Chen (2021-10-29 16:24:58)
> Hi Stephen,
>
> On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 4:16 PM Stephen Boyd <swboyd@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Quoting Philip Chen (2021-10-29 15:27:41)
> > > MSM DSI host driver actually parses "data-lanes" in DT and compare
> > > it with the number of DSI lanes the bridge driver sets for
> > > mipi_dsi_device. So we need to always specify "data-lanes" for the
> > > DSI host output. As of now, "data-lanes" is added to ti-sn65dsi86 dts
> > > fragment, but missing in parade-ps8640 dts fragment, which requires
> > > a fixup.
> >
> > I don't see data-lanes required in the schema, and
> > dsi_host_parse_lane_data() seems happy to continue without it. I do see
> > that num_data_lanes isn't set though. Does this patch fix it?
> The problem I see is from dsi_host_attach().
> If there is no "data-lanes" in DT, num_data_lanes would be 0.
> Then dsi_host_attach() would return -EINVAL.
Ok, got it.
>
> >
> > ----8<----
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi_host.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi_host.c
> > index e269df285136..f6fba07220e5 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi_host.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/dsi_host.c
> > @@ -1696,6 +1696,7 @@ static int dsi_host_parse_lane_data(struct
> > msm_dsi_host *msm_host,
> > if (!prop) {
> > DRM_DEV_DEBUG(dev,
> > "failed to find data lane mapping, using default\n");
> > + msm_host->num_data_lanes = 4;
> > return 0;
> > }
>
> I haven't tried.
> But I think it can fix the problem I described above.
> Would you like to send it as a separate patch?
> Or I can do it.
Sure feel free to send it as another patch. Or fix the schema to make
data-lanes required. I think fixing the driver is probably better so
that we don't have to set data-lanes when it's the default 4 lanes. At
least I think 4 lanes is the default.
