Hi Rob, robh@xxxxxxxxxx wrote on Wed, 20 Oct 2021 16:14:47 -0500: > On Wed, 20 Oct 2021 16:27:55 +0200, Miquel Raynal wrote: > > Let's get rid of spi-nand.txt by converting it to yaml schema. While at > > converting this file, let's actually pull all the generic properties > > from nand-chip.yaml which might apply to a SPI-NAND chip. > > > > Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > .../devicetree/bindings/mtd/spi-nand.txt | 5 ---- > > .../devicetree/bindings/mtd/spi-nand.yaml | 27 +++++++++++++++++++ > > 2 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > delete mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/spi-nand.txt > > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/spi-nand.yaml > > > > My bot found errors running 'make DT_CHECKER_FLAGS=-m dt_binding_check' > on your patch (DT_CHECKER_FLAGS is new in v5.13): > > yamllint warnings/errors: > > dtschema/dtc warnings/errors: > Unknown file referenced: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: '/usr/local/lib/python3.8/dist-packages/dtschema/schemas/mtd/nand-chip.yaml' > xargs: dt-doc-validate: exited with status 255; aborting > make[1]: *** Deleting file 'Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/snps,dw-apb-ssi.example.dt.yaml' > Unknown file referenced: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: '/usr/local/lib/python3.8/dist-packages/dtschema/schemas/mtd/nand-chip.yaml' > make[1]: *** [scripts/Makefile.lib:385: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/snps,dw-apb-ssi.example.dt.yaml] Error 255 > make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... > make: *** [Makefile:1441: dt_binding_check] Error 2 I am not able to reproduce this error and in general I don't understand it. There is no relationship between this change and snps,dw-apb-ssi.yaml. Also the fact that nand-chip-yaml do not exist, it was just created in the patch before so I wonder how much I should trust this error. Also, maybe I am not using the tools properly, but it is very hard to send correct bindings at the first try. Running make dt_binding_check takes ages, any change in one yaml file will recheck the entire data base and filtering out on a single yaml file is generally too restrictive and still prints unrelated errors of syntax on other files. I don't know how much of this is actually expected and/or if someone is working on it. Thanks, Miquèl
