Hi Hans On Mon, 18 Oct 2021 at 17:37, Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi Dillon, > > On 18/10/2021 07:04, dillon.minfei@xxxxxxxxx wrote: > > From: Dillon Min <dillon.minfei@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > stm32's clk driver register two ltdc gate clk to clk core by > > clk_hw_register_gate() and clk_hw_register_composite() > > > > first: 'stm32f429_gates[]', clk name is 'ltdc', which no user to use. > > second: 'stm32f429_aux_clk[]', clk name is 'lcd-tft', used by ltdc driver > > > > both of them point to the same offset of stm32's RCC register. after > > kernel enter console, clk core turn off ltdc's clk as 'stm32f429_gates[]' > > is no one to use. but, actually 'stm32f429_aux_clk[]' is in use. > > > > stm32f469/746/769 have the same issue, fix it. > > > > Fixes: daf2d117cbca ("clk: stm32f4: Add lcd-tft clock") > > Acked-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Just to double check (I asked as well when v1 was posted, but that's a long time ago): > I can ignore this patch, right? If so, then make sure you follow up on this in the clk > subsystem since it is not yet merged in mainline. > > If you DO want me to pick it up, then I see that the clk maintainer has already Acked > it, so I take it as well. Appreciate, please help to pick it up. Thanks & Regards Dillon > > Regards, > > Hans > > > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/1590564453-24499-7-git-send-email-dillon.minfei@xxxxxxxxx/ > > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAPTRvHkf0cK_4ZidM17rPo99gWDmxgqFt4CDUjqFFwkOeQeFDg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ > > Signed-off-by: Dillon Min <dillon.minfei@xxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > v5: no change. > > > > drivers/clk/clk-stm32f4.c | 4 ---- > > 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk-stm32f4.c b/drivers/clk/clk-stm32f4.c > > index af46176ad053..473dfe632cc5 100644 > > --- a/drivers/clk/clk-stm32f4.c > > +++ b/drivers/clk/clk-stm32f4.c > > @@ -129,7 +129,6 @@ static const struct stm32f4_gate_data stm32f429_gates[] __initconst = { > > { STM32F4_RCC_APB2ENR, 20, "spi5", "apb2_div" }, > > { STM32F4_RCC_APB2ENR, 21, "spi6", "apb2_div" }, > > { STM32F4_RCC_APB2ENR, 22, "sai1", "apb2_div" }, > > - { STM32F4_RCC_APB2ENR, 26, "ltdc", "apb2_div" }, > > }; > > > > static const struct stm32f4_gate_data stm32f469_gates[] __initconst = { > > @@ -211,7 +210,6 @@ static const struct stm32f4_gate_data stm32f469_gates[] __initconst = { > > { STM32F4_RCC_APB2ENR, 20, "spi5", "apb2_div" }, > > { STM32F4_RCC_APB2ENR, 21, "spi6", "apb2_div" }, > > { STM32F4_RCC_APB2ENR, 22, "sai1", "apb2_div" }, > > - { STM32F4_RCC_APB2ENR, 26, "ltdc", "apb2_div" }, > > }; > > > > static const struct stm32f4_gate_data stm32f746_gates[] __initconst = { > > @@ -286,7 +284,6 @@ static const struct stm32f4_gate_data stm32f746_gates[] __initconst = { > > { STM32F4_RCC_APB2ENR, 21, "spi6", "apb2_div" }, > > { STM32F4_RCC_APB2ENR, 22, "sai1", "apb2_div" }, > > { STM32F4_RCC_APB2ENR, 23, "sai2", "apb2_div" }, > > - { STM32F4_RCC_APB2ENR, 26, "ltdc", "apb2_div" }, > > }; > > > > static const struct stm32f4_gate_data stm32f769_gates[] __initconst = { > > @@ -364,7 +361,6 @@ static const struct stm32f4_gate_data stm32f769_gates[] __initconst = { > > { STM32F4_RCC_APB2ENR, 21, "spi6", "apb2_div" }, > > { STM32F4_RCC_APB2ENR, 22, "sai1", "apb2_div" }, > > { STM32F4_RCC_APB2ENR, 23, "sai2", "apb2_div" }, > > - { STM32F4_RCC_APB2ENR, 26, "ltdc", "apb2_div" }, > > { STM32F4_RCC_APB2ENR, 30, "mdio", "apb2_div" }, > > }; > > > > >