Re: [PATCH v11 09/16] soc: mediatek: add mtk-mmsys support for mt8195 vdosys0

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Add mt8195 vdosys0 clock driver name and routing table to
the driver data of mtk-mmsys.

Signed-off-by: jason-jh.lin <jason-jh.lin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
This patch is base on [1]
[1] soc: mediatek: mmsys: add mt8192 mmsys support
- https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-mediatek/list/?series=524857

The vdosys1 impelmentation patch [2]
[2] soc: mediatek: add mtk-mmsys support for mt8195 vdosys1
- https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-mediatek/patch/20210906071539.12953-7-nancy.lin@xxxxxxxxxxxx/
---

Hello Jason,
thanks for the patch! However, there are a few things to improve:


  drivers/soc/mediatek/mt8195-mmsys.h    | 114 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
  drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-mmsys.c       |  11 +++
  include/linux/soc/mediatek/mtk-mmsys.h |   9 ++
  3 files changed, 134 insertions(+)
  create mode 100644 drivers/soc/mediatek/mt8195-mmsys.h

diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mt8195-mmsys.h b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mt8195-mmsys.h
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..0c97a5f016c1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mt8195-mmsys.h
@@ -0,0 +1,114 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */
+
+#ifndef __SOC_MEDIATEK_MT8195_MMSYS_H
+#define __SOC_MEDIATEK_MT8195_MMSYS_H
+
+#define MT8195_VDO0_OVL_MOUT_EN					0xf14
+#define MT8195_MOUT_DISP_OVL0_TO_DISP_RDMA0			BIT(0)
+#define MT8195_MOUT_DISP_OVL0_TO_DISP_WDMA0			BIT(1)
+#define MT8195_MOUT_DISP_OVL0_TO_DISP_OVL1			BIT(2)
+#define MT8195_MOUT_DISP_OVL1_TO_DISP_RDMA1			BIT(4)
+#define MT8195_MOUT_DISP_OVL1_TO_DISP_WDMA1			BIT(5)
+#define MT8195_MOUT_DISP_OVL1_TO_DISP_OVL0			BIT(6)
+
+#define MT8195_VDO0_SEL_IN					0xf34
+#define MT8195_SEL_IN_VPP_MERGE_FROM_DSC_WRAP0_OUT		(0 << 0)

Bitshifting 0 by 0 bits == 0, so this is simply 0.

+#define MT8195_SEL_IN_VPP_MERGE_FROM_DISP_DITHER1		(1 << 0)

I would write 0x1 here

+#define MT8195_SEL_IN_VPP_MERGE_FROM_VDO1_VIRTUAL0		(2 << 0)

....and 0x2 here: bitshifting of 0 bits makes little sense.

+#define MT8195_SEL_IN_DSC_WRAP0_IN_FROM_DISP_DITHER0		(0 << 4)

Bitshifting 0 by 4 bits is still 0, so this is again 0.
This is repeated too many times, so I will not list it for all of the occurrences.

+#define MT8195_SEL_IN_DSC_WRAP0_IN_FROM_VPP_MERGE		(1 << 4)

This is BIT(4).

+#define MT8195_SEL_IN_DSC_WRAP1_IN_FROM_DISP_DITHER1		(0 << 5) > +#define MT8195_SEL_IN_DSC_WRAP1_IN_FROM_VPP_MERGE		(1 << 5)

...and this is BIT(5)

+#define MT8195_SEL_IN_SINA_VIRTUAL0_FROM_VPP_MERGE		(0 << 8)
+#define MT8195_SEL_IN_SINA_VIRTUAL0_FROM_DSC_WRAP1_OUT		(1 << 8)

BIT(8)

+#define MT8195_SEL_IN_SINB_VIRTUAL0_FROM_DSC_WRAP0_OUT		(0 << 9)
+#define MT8195_SEL_IN_DP_INTF0_FROM_DSC_WRAP1_OUT		(0 << 12)
+#define MT8195_SEL_IN_DP_INTF0_FROM_VPP_MERGE			(1 << 12)

BIT(12)

+#define MT8195_SEL_IN_DP_INTF0_FROM_VDO1_VIRTUAL0		(2 << 12)

BIT(13)

... and please, use the BIT(nr) macro for all these bit definitions, it's way more
readable like that.

Regards,
- Angelo



[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux