On Wed, 13 Oct 2021 at 16:38, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
>
> dtc started warning about some of the CPU addresses:
>
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynosautov9.dtsi:78.20-83.5: Warning (unit_address_format): /cpus/cpu@000000: unit name should not have leading 0s
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynosautov9.dtsi:85.20-90.5: Warning (unit_address_format): /cpus/cpu@000100: unit name should not have leading 0s
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynosautov9.dtsi:92.20-97.5: Warning (unit_address_format): /cpus/cpu@000200: unit name should not have leading 0s
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynosautov9.dtsi:99.20-104.5: Warning (unit_address_format): /cpus/cpu@000300: unit name should not have leading 0s
>
> Remove the leading zeroes.
>
> Fixes: f695b3f4c45d ("arm64: dts: exynos: add initial support for exynosautov9 SoC")
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
> ---
Thanks Arnd, but this was fixed with the next version of patchset.
It's my bad because I did not drop the patch from my next branch after
spotting it, knowing that Chanho will resubmit the next day and then I
would replace it. This replacement happened next day but linux next
got the older/buggy patch.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
