Hi Adam, Am Sonntag, dem 03.10.2021 um 05:43 -0500 schrieb Adam Ford: > On Fri, Oct 1, 2021 at 8:00 PM Lucas Stach <l.stach@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > This reverts commit a77ebdd9f553. It turns out that the VPU domain has no > > different requirements, even though the downstream ATF implementation seems > > to suggest otherwise. Powering on the domain with the reset asserted works > > fine. As the changed sequence has caused sporadic issues with the GPU > > domains, just revert the change to go back to the working sequence. > > > > Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> # 5.14 > > Signed-off-by: Lucas Stach <l.stach@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Acked-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@xxxxxxx> > > --- > > Lucas, > > I applied your series to the 5.14.y kernel to test with the > imx8mm-beacon board, but I found that it doesn't wake from sleep. > I'll experiment with other versions of ATF. If nobody else has this > problem, I'll assume, it's an error on my part. I've tested this series on the i.MX8MM-EVK and a custom (not yet public) i.MX8MM board and both did work as expected with both system suspend/resume and runtime power management for the display parts. I've used the upstream TF-A release v2.5. Regards, Lucas > > adam > > > drivers/soc/imx/gpcv2.c | 4 ++-- > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/soc/imx/gpcv2.c b/drivers/soc/imx/gpcv2.c > > index 34a9ac1f2b9b..8b7a01773aec 100644 > > --- a/drivers/soc/imx/gpcv2.c > > +++ b/drivers/soc/imx/gpcv2.c > > @@ -244,6 +244,8 @@ static int imx_pgc_power_up(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd) > > goto out_regulator_disable; > > } > > > > + reset_control_assert(domain->reset); > > + > > if (domain->bits.pxx) { > > /* request the domain to power up */ > > regmap_update_bits(domain->regmap, GPC_PU_PGC_SW_PUP_REQ, > > @@ -266,8 +268,6 @@ static int imx_pgc_power_up(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd) > > GPC_PGC_CTRL_PCR); > > } > > > > - reset_control_assert(domain->reset); > > - > > /* delay for reset to propagate */ > > udelay(5); > > > > -- > > 2.30.2 > >