The Qualcomm SMEM binding always depended on a reference to a SRAM node
of compatible "qcom,rpm-msg-ram", document this as part of the SRAM
binding.
The SRAM is consumed as a whole and not split up using subnodes, so
properties related to this are not required.
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
Changes since v1:
- New patch, to resolve issue with the existing qcom,smem example
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sram/sram.yaml | 5 ++++-
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sram/sram.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sram/sram.yaml
index 3eda5049d183..e3311b54db33 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sram/sram.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sram/sram.yaml
@@ -31,6 +31,7 @@ properties:
- amlogic,meson-gxbb-sram
- arm,juno-sram-ns
- atmel,sama5d2-securam
+ - qcom,rpm-msg-ram
- rockchip,rk3288-pmu-sram
reg:
@@ -135,7 +136,9 @@ if:
properties:
compatible:
contains:
- const: rockchip,rk3288-pmu-sram
+ enum:
+ - qcom,rpm-msg-ram
+ - rockchip,rk3288-pmu-sram
else:
required:
--
2.29.2
