oops.. cover-letter $subject is probably improved with "board-specific compatible"?, but anyways, does'nt matter for the rest f the actual patches.. On 15:24-20210917, Sinthu Raja wrote: > From: Sinthu Raja <sinthu.raja@xxxxxx> > > Bjorn, > > The series of patches are meant to help make the rproc bindings for K3 > r5f and dsp support independent of board/platform involved. The current > examples get in the way of the device tree cleanups and new platform > introductions [1]. > > When applying this series, it would greatly help us if you could provide > us with a immutable tag for Nishanth to merge in and help introduce the > newer platforms that are blocked by this cleanup. See [2] for further > context of why we are requesting for immutable tag. Yes again please. once Rob reviews the binding patches, This series is blocking me and thanks for respinning them. For the series: Reviewed-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@xxxxxx> > > Changes in V3: > - Added r5f cleanup as well > - Commit message, $subject and simplification of the fixup. > > V2: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20210818074030.1877-1-sinthu.raja@xxxxxx/ > V1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20210817152005.21575-1-sinthu.raja@xxxxxx/ > > > Sinthu Raja (2): > dt-bindings: remoteproc: k3-r5f: Remove board-specific compatible from > DT example > dt-bindings: remoteproc: k3-dsp: Remove board-specific compatible from > DT example > > .../devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/ti,k3-dsp-rproc.yaml | 4 +--- > .../devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/ti,k3-r5f-rproc.yaml | 4 +--- > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/1631794913.472895.1119414.nullmailer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ > [2] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20210125141642.4yybjnklk3qsqjdy@steersman/ > -- > 2.32.0 > -- Regards, Nishanth Menon Key (0xDDB5849D1736249D) / Fingerprint: F8A2 8693 54EB 8232 17A3 1A34 DDB5 849D 1736 249D