> I think there was a reason for "sensors", because there can be other > bindings on the same level. Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwmon/ltc2978.txt > lists "regulators", for example. > > Where did you find the "sensors" example for ltc2978 ? I don't see it > in the upstream kernel. Or was that derived from the official "regulators" > bindings ? Yes, I just followed the structure from there, renaming "regulators" as "sensors". > Yes, let's do that. I'd like us to keep the "sensors" subnode to have a clear > association and differentiator to other sub-nodes such as "regulators". > Open is if we can use "temperature-sensor@0" or if it would have to be > a chip specific "ltd", but I think we can sort that out after suggesting > an initial set of bindings to Rob. Makes sense, I'll do that. Now I just need to figure out how to express that in YAML ... I'll send a new patch as soon as I figured that out and got it to work. Thanks for your input! Oskar.
