Hi Matti,
On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 8:31 AM Vaittinen, Matti
<Matti.Vaittinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 9/15/21 15:14, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > Convert the ROHM BD9571MWV/BD9574MWF Power Management Integrated Circuit
> > (PMIC) Device Tree binding documentation to json-schema.
> >
> > Make the "regulators" subnode optional, as not all users describe the
> > regulators.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > I have listed Marek as the maintainer, as he wrote the original
> > bindings. Marek: Please scream if this is inappropriate ;-)
> >
> > v2:
> > - Add Reviewed-by.
> > ---
> > .../devicetree/bindings/mfd/bd9571mwv.txt | 69 ----------
> > .../bindings/mfd/rohm,bd9571mwv.yaml | 127 ++++++++++++++++++
> > 2 files changed, 127 insertions(+), 69 deletions(-)
> > delete mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/bd9571mwv.txt
> > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/rohm,bd9571mwv.yaml
> > + regulators {
> > + dvfs: dvfs {
> > + regulator-name = "dvfs";
> > + regulator-min-microvolt = <750000>;
> > + regulator-max-microvolt = <1030000>;
> > + regulator-boot-on;
> > + regulator-always-on;
> Out of the curiosity (and in order to learn) - what is the exact idea of
> the 'regulator-boot-on' and when it should be used? I _think_ the
> 'regulator-boot-on' is in many cases used to make the regulator
> framework to enable the regulator at start-up. What I _think_ the
> 'regulator-boot-on' is intended for is to advertise the regulator
> boot-up state for regulators which do not provide a way to get the
> state. I am unsure if there is any property which is intended to be used
> for enabling the regulator at start-up. DISCLAIMER: Source of these
> thoughts is unknown. I may be wrong here. If someone knows this for sure
> I'd be grateful for any education :) If I am not mistaken the dvfs
> regulator does provide a way of reading the enable state after boot.
>
> Finally, I have seen this quite many times before but I am unsure I
> understand it - why setting both the 'regulator-boot-on' and
> 'regulator-always-on'? Wouldn't the 'regulator-always-on' suffice?
> > + };
> > + };
> > + };
> > + };
> >
>
> Anyways - as I mentioned, I am not 100% sure of pretty much anything :)
> Hence my questions are just questions - and the binding looks good to me.
I have to defer to the regulator experts to answer those questions...
> FWIW:
> acked-by: Matti Vaittinen <matti.vaittinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
s/a/A/
Thank you!
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
