Hi!
On Fri, Aug 01, 2014 at 05:27:57PM -0500, Thor Thayer wrote:
>
> On 08/01/2014 03:13 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
> >On Thu, 31 Jul 2014, Thor Thayer wrote:
> >>On 07/31/2014 03:26 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
> >>>On Wed, 30 Jul 2014, tthayer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
[...]
> >>>>+u32 altera_sdr_readl(struct altera_sdr *sdr, u32 reg_offset)
> >>>>+{
> >>>>+ return readl(sdr->reg_base + reg_offset);
> >>>>+}
> >>>>+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(altera_sdr_readl);
> >>>>+
> >>>>+void altera_sdr_writel(struct altera_sdr *sdr, u32 reg_offset, u32 value)
> >>>>+{
> >>>>+ writel(value, sdr->reg_base + reg_offset);
> >>>>+}
> >>>>+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(altera_sdr_writel);
> We'd prefer to use syscon and that is what we started with. If you'd
> like to be our advocate, I will return to that because it was pretty
> clean. My primary concern is to get it upstreamed and if it is MFD
> then I'll make the changes.
>
> Here are the threads.
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=140128791902800&w=2
The conclusion of this thread was syscon for offset 0x0, no ?!
And if you decide to have new writel/readl functions, I'd prefer if you don't
change the order of parameters just because. That always weirds me out, when
there are vendorname_writel functions, that only change the API of writel and
nothing else (not exactly the case here).
Regards,
Steffen
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
