In a future patch the GCC driver will stop requesting this xo clock by
its global "xo" name, in favour of of having an explicit phandle here in
the DT. Aside from that this clock in addition to the mandatory
"sleep_clk" were never passed despite being required by the relevant
dt-bindings.
Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8998.dtsi | 5 ++++-
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8998.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8998.dtsi
index e9d3ce29937c..05ac5172fcba 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8998.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8998.dtsi
@@ -117,7 +117,7 @@ xo: xo-board {
clock-output-names = "xo_board";
};
- sleep_clk {
+ sleep_clk: sleep-clk {
compatible = "fixed-clock";
#clock-cells = <0>;
clock-frequency = <32764>;
@@ -855,6 +855,9 @@ gcc: clock-controller@100000 {
#reset-cells = <1>;
#power-domain-cells = <1>;
reg = <0x00100000 0xb0000>;
+
+ clock-names = "xo", "sleep_clk";
+ clocks = <&xo>, <&sleep_clk>;
};
rpm_msg_ram: memory@778000 {
--
2.33.0
