On Tue, Sep 7, 2021 at 8:50 PM Rob Herring <robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 3, 2021 at 9:58 PM Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Hi Rob > > > > On Sat, Sep 4, 2021 at 12:50 AM Rob Herring <robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, Sep 3, 2021 at 11:42 AM Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Fri, 03 Sep 2021 17:29:36 +0800, Shengjiu Wang wrote: > > > > > Define the compatible string and properties needed by imx_dsp_rproc > > > > > driver. > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@xxxxxxx> > > > > > --- > > > > > .../remoteproc/fsl,imx-dsp-rproc.yaml | 131 ++++++++++++++++++ > > > > > 1 file changed, 131 insertions(+) > > > > > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/fsl,imx-dsp-rproc.yaml > > > > > > > > > > > > > Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > I take that back. What's the difference with this binding and > > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dsp/fsl,dsp.yaml? > > > > Some devices, but two kinds of driver. one for remoteproc > > framework, another one is for ALSA. > > So should I merge fsl,imx-dsp-rproc.yaml to fsl,dsp.yaml? > > You can have 100 drivers for all I care, but it's 1 DT binding for 1 > piece of h/w. > Ok, I will merge it to fsl,dsp.yaml Best regards wang shengjiu
