On Fri, Aug 01, 2014 at 05:59:54PM +0530, Jassi Brar wrote: > Hello, > Here's v10. Not much different from v9. The code and the generic > bindings looked good enough to relevant gods, but the patchset still > needs some formal loving in the form of Acked-by's. > > Changes since v9: > o Purely cosmetic changes - added headers and used BIT() Given that this code is now getting very stable can I suggest setting up a git tree and making sure it's included in -next? Just send Stephen a mail with a pointer to the relevant tree and branch and ask him to add it. I'd say it's probably worth merging at this point though since it's not been in -next yet and the merge window is likely to open this weekend it might be a bit much to try to merge it this window.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
