Re: [PATCH v2 33/46] mfd: ti_am335x_tscadc: Move control register configuration

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Jonathan,

jic23@xxxxxxxxxx wrote on Sun, 5 Sep 2021 14:18:52 +0100:

> On Fri, 3 Sep 2021 16:24:22 +0300
> Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@xxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > On 03/09/2021 00:51, Miquel Raynal wrote:  
> > > The datasheet states that most of the configuration should be set in the
> > > control register in the first place, before actually enabling the
> > > hardware. So far only half of the configuration was made in the first
> > > step, which does not make really sense and would complicating the code
> > > when introducing support for the am437x hardware.
> > > 
> > > Let's move that register write a bit below to enclose more configuration.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > >   drivers/mfd/ti_am335x_tscadc.c | 2 ++
> > >   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/mfd/ti_am335x_tscadc.c b/drivers/mfd/ti_am335x_tscadc.c
> > > index 29ada9da8826..a0db3e4ff265 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/mfd/ti_am335x_tscadc.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/mfd/ti_am335x_tscadc.c
> > > @@ -239,6 +239,8 @@ static	int ti_tscadc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > >   	}
> > >   	regmap_write(tscadc->regmap, REG_CTRL, tscadc->ctrl);
> > >   
> > > +	regmap_write(tscadc->regmap, REG_CTRL, tscadc->ctrl);
> > > +    
> > 
> > Strange change - above 2 lines a the same !?  
> 
> Yup, Looks like this one got handled earlier and the rebase went wrong.
> So drop it.

Exactly. That's a rebase issue I didn't notice.

Thanks,
Miquèl



[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux