On Tue, 2021-08-24 at 15:35 +0800, Hsin-Yi Wang wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 13, 2021 at 3:03 PM Yong Wu <yong.wu@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > For MM IOMMU, We always add device link between smi-common and
> > IOMMU HW.
> > In mt8195, we add smi-sub-common. Thus, if the node is sub-common,
> > we still
> > need find again to get smi-common, then do device link.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Yong Wu <yong.wu@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c | 11 +++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c
> > index a4479916ad33..a72241724adb 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c
> > @@ -845,6 +845,17 @@ static int mtk_iommu_mm_dts_parse(struct
> > device *dev,
> > if (!smicomm_node)
> > return -EINVAL;
> >
> > + /* Find smi-common again if this is smi-sub-common */
> > + if (of_property_read_bool(smicomm_node,
> > "mediatek,smi_sub_common")) {
> > + of_node_put(smicomm_node); /* put the sub common */
> > +
> > + smicomm_node = of_parse_phandle(smicomm_node,
> > "mediatek,smi", 0);
>
> This only checks 1 level here, and does not check if the mediatek,smi
> of a sub-common node is not another sub-common node.
> So maybe add a check that the updated node here doesn't have
> mediatek,smi_sub_common property.
Yes. Currently there are only 2 levels. we could confirm if it is sub-
common from if it has "mediatek,smi", then "mediatek,smi_sub_common" is
unnecessary.
Will fix in the next version.
>
> > + if (!smicomm_node) {
> > + dev_err(dev, "sub-comm has no common.\n");
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + }
> > + }
> > +
> > plarbdev = of_find_device_by_node(smicomm_node);
> > of_node_put(smicomm_node);
> > data->smicomm_dev = &plarbdev->dev;
> > --
> > 2.18.0
> > _______________________________________________
> > Linux-mediatek mailing list
> > Linux-mediatek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek
