Quoting rajpat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx (2021-08-31 08:28:51)
> On 2021-08-26 23:41, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > Quoting Rajesh Patil (2021-08-26 06:15:30)
> >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280-idp.dtsi
> >> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280-idp.dtsi
> >> index 7c106c0..65126a7 100644
> >> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280-idp.dtsi
> >> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280-idp.dtsi
> >> @@ -225,6 +225,10 @@
> >> status = "okay";
> >> };
> >>
> >> +&qupv3_id_1 {
> >> + status = "okay";
> >> +};
> >> +
> >
> > Why enable this here but not any of the i2c/spi/uart devices that are a
> > child? Can this hunk be split off to a different patch?
> >
>
> Currently there is no usecase on qup1 and hence not enabled.
> Regarding splitting this, I did not get the exact reason why we need to
> split. This patch adds all the qup wrapper1 nodes and we are enabling it
> in board file.
I'm happy to see this part dropped from the patch. If nothing is enabled
that's a child of the qup then enabling it serves no purpose.
