On 2021-08-26 23:41, Stephen Boyd wrote:
Quoting Rajesh Patil (2021-08-26 06:15:30)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280-idp.dtsi
b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280-idp.dtsi
index 7c106c0..65126a7 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280-idp.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280-idp.dtsi
@@ -225,6 +225,10 @@
status = "okay";
};
+&qupv3_id_1 {
+ status = "okay";
+};
+
Why enable this here but not any of the i2c/spi/uart devices that are a
child? Can this hunk be split off to a different patch?
Currently there is no usecase on qup1 and hence not enabled.
Regarding splitting this, I did not get the exact reason why we need to
split. This patch adds all the qup wrapper1 nodes and we are enabling it
in board file.
&sdhc_1 {
status = "okay";
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi
b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi
index a3c11b0..32f411f 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi
@@ -2040,6 +2469,46 @@
function = "qup07";
};
+ qup_i2c8_data_clk:qup-i2c8-data-clk {
Unstick please.
OKay.
+ pins = "gpio32", "gpio33";
+ function = "qup10";
+ };
+
+ qup_i2c9_data_clk:qup-i2c9-data-clk {
+ pins = "gpio36", "gpio37";
+ function = "qup11";
+ };
+
+ qup_i2c10_data_clk:qup-i2c10-data-clk {
+ pins = "gpio40", "gpio41";
+ function = "qup12";
+ };
+
+ qup_i2c11_data_clk:qup-i2c11-data-clk {
+ pins = "gpio44", "gpio45";
+ function = "qup13";
+ };
+
+ qup_i2c12_data_clk:qup-i2c12-data-clk {
+ pins = "gpio48", "gpio49";
+ function = "qup14";
+ };
+
+ qup_i2c13_data_clk:qup-i2c13-data-clk {
+ pins = "gpio52", "gpio53";
+ function = "qup15";
+ };
+
+ qup_i2c14_data_clk:qup-i2c14-data-clk {
+ pins = "gpio56", "gpio57";
+ function = "qup16";
+ };
+
+ qup_i2c15_data_clk:qup-i2c15-data-clk {
+ pins = "gpio60", "gpio61";
+ function = "qup17";
+ };
All of these.
+
qup_spi0_data_clk: qup-spi0-data-clk {
pins = "gpio0", "gpio1", "gpio2";
function = "qup00";