On 20/08/2021 15:28, Tudor.Ambarus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > On 8/19/21 8:36 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe >> >> On 19/08/2021 19:28, Pratyush Yadav wrote: >>> + Tudor (you should be listed as a maintainer for this file IMO) >>> >>> On 19/08/21 06:59PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >>>> Document bindings for the issi,is25wp256 SPI NOR flash. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>> --- >>>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/jedec,spi-nor.yaml | 1 + >>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) >>>> >>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/jedec,spi-nor.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/jedec,spi-nor.yaml >>>> index ed590d7c6e37..0db64ac7dc33 100644 >>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/jedec,spi-nor.yaml >>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/jedec,spi-nor.yaml >>>> @@ -33,6 +33,7 @@ properties: >>>> - items: >>>> - enum: >>>> - issi,is25lp016d >>>> + - issi,is25wp256 >>> >>> I don't think we want to add any new flash specific compatibles. Why is >>> "jedec,spi-nor" not enough for you? >> >> It's fine for me. I had impression that specific compatibles are still >> preferred and one of boards is using this one. The other way is to >> remove this compatible from the board DTS. >> > > Pratyush is right, we prefer to bind just to the generic "jedec,spi-nor" > compatible whenever possible. Thanks for confirming this. I'll fixup the dts. Best regards, Krzysztof
