On Sun, Aug 22, 2021 at 09:31:39PM +0200, Alvin Šipraga wrote:
> From: Alvin Šipraga <alsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> realtek-smi-core fails to unregister the slave MII bus on module unload,
> raising the following BUG warning:
>
> mdio_bus.c:650: BUG_ON(bus->state != MDIOBUS_UNREGISTERED);
>
> kernel BUG at drivers/net/phy/mdio_bus.c:650!
> Internal error: Oops - BUG: 0 [#1] PREEMPT_RT SMP
> Call trace:
> mdiobus_free+0x4c/0x50
> devm_mdiobus_free+0x18/0x20
> release_nodes.isra.0+0x1c0/0x2b0
> devres_release_all+0x38/0x58
> device_release_driver_internal+0x124/0x1e8
> driver_detach+0x54/0xe0
> bus_remove_driver+0x60/0xd8
> driver_unregister+0x34/0x60
> platform_driver_unregister+0x18/0x20
> realtek_smi_driver_exit+0x14/0x1c [realtek_smi]
>
> Fix this by duly unregistering the slave MII bus with
> mdiobus_unregister. We do this in the DSA teardown path, since
> registration is performed in the DSA setup path.
>
> Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Fixes: d8652956cf37 ("net: dsa: realtek-smi: Add Realtek SMI driver")
> Signed-off-by: Alvin Šipraga <alsi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/net/dsa/realtek-smi-core.c | 6 ++++++
> drivers/net/dsa/realtek-smi-core.h | 1 +
> drivers/net/dsa/rtl8366rb.c | 8 ++++++++
> 3 files changed, 15 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/realtek-smi-core.c b/drivers/net/dsa/realtek-smi-core.c
> index 8e49d4f85d48..6992b6b31db6 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/dsa/realtek-smi-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/dsa/realtek-smi-core.c
> @@ -383,6 +383,12 @@ int realtek_smi_setup_mdio(struct realtek_smi *smi)
> return ret;
> }
>
> +void realtek_smi_teardown_mdio(struct realtek_smi *smi)
> +{
> + if (smi->slave_mii_bus)
> + mdiobus_unregister(smi->slave_mii_bus);
> +}
> +
> static int realtek_smi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> const struct realtek_smi_variant *var;
> diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/realtek-smi-core.h b/drivers/net/dsa/realtek-smi-core.h
> index fcf465f7f922..6cfa5f2df7ea 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/dsa/realtek-smi-core.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/dsa/realtek-smi-core.h
> @@ -119,6 +119,7 @@ struct realtek_smi_variant {
> int realtek_smi_write_reg_noack(struct realtek_smi *smi, u32 addr,
> u32 data);
> int realtek_smi_setup_mdio(struct realtek_smi *smi);
> +void realtek_smi_teardown_mdio(struct realtek_smi *smi);
>
> /* RTL8366 library helpers */
> int rtl8366_mc_is_used(struct realtek_smi *smi, int mc_index, int *used);
> diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/rtl8366rb.c b/drivers/net/dsa/rtl8366rb.c
> index a89093bc6c6a..6537fac7aba4 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/dsa/rtl8366rb.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/dsa/rtl8366rb.c
> @@ -982,6 +982,13 @@ static int rtl8366rb_setup(struct dsa_switch *ds)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static void rtl8366rb_teardown(struct dsa_switch *ds)
> +{
> + struct realtek_smi *smi = ds->priv;
> +
> + realtek_smi_teardown_mdio(smi);
> +}
> +
Objection: dsa_switch_teardown has:
if (ds->slave_mii_bus && ds->ops->phy_read)
mdiobus_unregister(ds->slave_mii_bus);
The realtek_smi_setup_mdio function does:
smi->ds->slave_mii_bus = smi->slave_mii_bus;
so I would expect that this would result in a double unregister on some
systems.
I haven't went through your new driver, but I wonder whether you have
the phy_read and phy_write methods implemented? Maybe that is the
difference?
> static enum dsa_tag_protocol rtl8366_get_tag_protocol(struct dsa_switch *ds,
> int port,
> enum dsa_tag_protocol mp)
> @@ -1505,6 +1512,7 @@ static int rtl8366rb_detect(struct realtek_smi *smi)
> static const struct dsa_switch_ops rtl8366rb_switch_ops = {
> .get_tag_protocol = rtl8366_get_tag_protocol,
> .setup = rtl8366rb_setup,
> + .teardown = rtl8366rb_teardown,
> .phylink_mac_link_up = rtl8366rb_mac_link_up,
> .phylink_mac_link_down = rtl8366rb_mac_link_down,
> .get_strings = rtl8366_get_strings,
> --
> 2.32.0
>
