On Wed, 2021-08-18 at 15:50 +0800, Eizan Miyamoto wrote: > Hi Houlong, > > Thank you for your review on this series, it is much appreciated. > > On Mon, Aug 16, 2021 at 2:53 PM houlong wei <houlong.wei@xxxxxxxxxxxx > > wrote: > > Is your removing "mediatek,vpu" necessary for this series "Refactor > > MTK > > MDP driver into core/components" ? > > Removing it is not strictly necessary for the series to function, I > will re-upload the series and omit the following changes: > - [PATCH v6 8/9] dts: mtk-mdp: remove mediatek,vpu property from > primary MDP device > - [PATCH v6 9/9] dt-bindings: mediatek: remove vpu requirement from > mtk-mdp > > Do please let me know if you meant something different. > > Thanks, > > Eizan > > Hi Eizan, Thanks for your help and effort. It's exactly what I expressed. Regards, Houlong > > > > > > In some MediaTek projects (not upstream yet), the device-tree node > > name > > "vpu" may be changed to something like "vpu0", "vpu1" or other > > name, > > which depends on the implementation of "mtk-vpu" driver. We can > > specify > > the different phandle to "mediatek,vpu" in .dtsi file. If we use > > of_find_node_by_name() to get the vpu_node, we have to modify the > > name > > string in different project. > > If the answer of my previous questions is "No", I prefer to slow > > down > > the modification of removing "mediatek,vpu". > > > > Sorry for late reply. > > > > Regards, > > Houlong
