Hi Houlong, Thank you for your review on this series, it is much appreciated. On Mon, Aug 16, 2021 at 2:53 PM houlong wei <houlong.wei@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Is your removing "mediatek,vpu" necessary for this series "Refactor MTK > MDP driver into core/components" ? Removing it is not strictly necessary for the series to function, I will re-upload the series and omit the following changes: - [PATCH v6 8/9] dts: mtk-mdp: remove mediatek,vpu property from primary MDP device - [PATCH v6 9/9] dt-bindings: mediatek: remove vpu requirement from mtk-mdp Do please let me know if you meant something different. Thanks, Eizan > > In some MediaTek projects (not upstream yet), the device-tree node name > "vpu" may be changed to something like "vpu0", "vpu1" or other name, > which depends on the implementation of "mtk-vpu" driver. We can specify > the different phandle to "mediatek,vpu" in .dtsi file. If we use > of_find_node_by_name() to get the vpu_node, we have to modify the name > string in different project. > If the answer of my previous questions is "No", I prefer to slow down > the modification of removing "mediatek,vpu". > > Sorry for late reply. > > Regards, > Houlong
