On Thu, Aug 5, 2021 at 7:02 AM Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 29, 2021 at 11:43 AM Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 29, 2021 at 4:23 PM zhiyong.tao <zhiyong.tao@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > The rsel actual bias resistance of each setting is different in > > > different IC. we think that the define "MTK_PULL_SET_RSEL_000" is more > > > common for all different IC. > > > > I see. I personally prefer having things clearly described. I can > > understand this might be an extra burden to support different chips > > with different parameters, though this should be fairly straightforward > > with lookup tables tied to the compatible strings. > > > > Let's see if Rob and Linus have anything to add. > > Not much. We have "soft pushed" for this to be described as generic > as possible, using SI units (ohms). But we also allow vendor-specific > numbers in this attribute. Especially when reverse engineering SoCs > that the contributor don't really have specs on (example M1 Mac). > > The intent with the SI units is especially for people like you folks working > with Chromium to be able to use different SoCs and not feel lost > to a forest of different ways of doing things and associated > mistakes because vendors have hopelessly idiomatic pin configs. I'll take that as "use SI units whenever possible and reasonable". Thanks. ChenYu
