Hello, On 12/08/2021 19:37:58+0530, Hari Prasath wrote: > Add comments for the end user for modifying the DTS file for > instantiating the sama5d29 SoC. > > Signed-off-by: Hari Prasath <Hari.PrasathGE@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > arch/arm/boot/dts/at91-sama5d2_xplained.dts | 5 +++++ > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/at91-sama5d2_xplained.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/at91-sama5d2_xplained.dts > index 627b7bf88d83..faa30063d9a9 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/at91-sama5d2_xplained.dts > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/at91-sama5d2_xplained.dts > @@ -6,6 +6,11 @@ > * 2015 Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@xxxxxxxxx> > */ > /dts-v1/; > +/* > + * Replace the line below with "sama5d29.dtsi" in order to instantiate the > + * sama5d29 SoC of the sama5d2 family.Otherwise, leave it unchanged when > + * using sama5d27 SoC for instance. > + */ I guess it would be better to have a at91-sama5d29_xplained.dts (and we should have had a at91-sama5d27_xplained.dts), else, you can't create an image that will support both variants. -- Alexandre Belloni, co-owner and COO, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com
