Am 28.07.2014 14:20, schrieb Mark Brown: > On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 01:43:02PM +0200, Andreas Färber wrote: >> Am 25.07.2014 12:39, schrieb Mark Brown: >>> On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 12:32:43PM +0200, Andreas Färber wrote: > >>>> Maybe this works for you? >>>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/4620191/ > >>>> Otherwise I can resend with Ab/Rb. > >>> Documentation/SubmittingPatches. > >> Not helpful here, nor is >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/submitting-patches.txt. It's separate >> from code changes, sent via git-send-email, has a Sob, went to LKML and >> LAKML and DTML. I could add a Fixes: header and CC trivial for this >> one-line fix IIUC. > > It's telling you that the kernel process is to review patches sent via > e-mail, not random links to web appliations - notice the context to > which I'm replying, I'm saying that sending a link to something on the > web isn't a good way of submitting a patch. > >> Doesn't tell me which patches I should CC you on in the future though. >> Therefore my request to fix the false negative in MAINTAINERS so that me >> and other kernel newbies don't run into it again. > > Feel free to submit patches if you want to see changes. Dude, this patch *was* submitted and has been reviewed by two people. Don't pretend I didn't follow the SubmittingPatches workflow. The link I gave you contains an mbox-format link that can be used with wget and git-am to *apply* the patch if you apparently missed it on the mailing lists. I will *re*-submit it for your convenience. Andreas -- SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer; HRB 16746 AG Nürnberg
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
