Hi Marc, On Thu, Jul 15, 2021 at 9:33 AM Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Why? > > Don't remember exactly why It doesn't work. I think it was a missing > quirk that the imx6 doesn't need. > > > "fsl,imx8mp-flexcan" is passed as the more specific compatible string > > and it should match against it first. > > ACK - but why specify the imx6 in the compatible list if the flexcan IP > core isn't compatible with the one of the imx6? Correct. The change in this patch looks good. The commit log needs improvement though.
