On 13-07-21, 13:34, Rob Herring wrote: > On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 9:19 AM Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > We already do this for linux-event-codes.h and so I thought it is the > > right way of doing it :) > > Humm, maybe it's okay. Please double check then... > > > Else we can create a new copy, which will be a mess, or use hardcoded > > values. > > Though you may not need the header based on what Arnd and I have suggested. Yeah, we may not need it at all. New node or not, reg property will get converted to a compatible anyway.. Thanks. -- viresh
