On 13. 06. 21 10:35, Shawn Guo wrote:
On Mon, May 24, 2021 at 10:59:14AM +0200, Michal Vokáč wrote:
On 23. 05. 21 5:49, Shawn Guo wrote:
On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 11:55:14AM +0200, Michal Vokáč wrote:
The imx6dl-yapp4 platform uses a GE-LX012864FWPP3N0000 OLED display.
The display consist of a 128x64 OLED panel and a SSD1305 controller.
The OLED panel resolution is 128x64 but the built-in controller default
resolution is 132x64. To display properly a segment offset needs to be
configured.
Signed-off-by: Michal Vokáč <michal.vokac@xxxxxxxxx>
Why are you resending? Please state reason when you resend.
I can't tell where but a while ago I read in some documentation
that if you do not get any response for aprox. two weeks you
can/should resend the patch in case it fell through the cracks.
I sent these patches in the middle of April, four weeks ago,
and have got no replies since then. So I [RESEND PATCH] these.
No. You can send a ping if there is no response for 2~3 weeks but not
RESEND. RESEND is normally used to refresh aged patches that needs to
be rebased to the latest release, or to make some minor update that
doesn't deserve a new version, like error in commit log etc.
I totally understand that you, and all maintainers and reviewers
in general, are very busy so it may take a long time to reply.
AFAIK one does not need to state a reason for RESEND PATCH.
The word RESEND itself should explain the reason. This is not v2,
where I would of course describe what has changed.
No. Always state the reason for resending. Maintainers do not know why
you are resending.
OK, fair enough, I will do so next time.
Thank you for your time to explain this.
Michal
