On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 03:40:53PM +0200, Etienne Carriere wrote: > Introduce compatible "linaro,scmi-optee" for SCMI transport channel > based on an OP-TEE service invocation. > > Cc: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Signed-off-by: Etienne Carriere <etienne.carriere@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > Changes since v1: > - Removed modification regarding mboxes property description. > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,scmi.txt | 3 ++- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,scmi.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,scmi.txt > index 856d041b397e..ccab2ef6f6ec 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,scmi.txt > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,scmi.txt > @@ -14,7 +14,8 @@ Required properties: > > The scmi node with the following properties shall be under the /firmware/ node. > > -- compatible : shall be "arm,scmi" or "arm,scmi-smc" for smc/hvc transports > +- compatible : shall be "arm,scmi" or "arm,scmi-smc" for smc/hvc transports, > + or "linaro,scmi-optee" for OP-TEE transport. Please rebase this [1] when you post next version. It is not clear about the mailbox or shmem properties here for this new OP-TEE transport but I assume it will be easier to understand with yaml schema. -- Regards, Sudeep [1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210601224904.917990-9-sudeep.holla@xxxxxxx/
