On Wed, May 26, 2021 at 9:52 AM Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, 25 May 2021, Robert Marko wrote: > > > On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 9:46 AM Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, 24 May 2021, Rob Herring wrote: > > > > > > > On Mon, May 24, 2021 at 02:05:38PM +0200, Robert Marko wrote: > > > > > Add binding documents for the Delta TN48M CPLD drivers. > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Robert Marko <robert.marko@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > --- > > > > > Changes in v2: > > > > > * Implement MFD as a simple I2C MFD > > > > > * Add GPIO bindings as separate > > > > > > > > I don't understand why this changed. This doesn't look like an MFD to > > > > me. Make your binding complete if there are missing functions. > > > > Otherwise, stick with what I already ok'ed. > > > > > > Right. What else, besides GPIO, does this do? > > > > It currently does not do anything else as hwmon driver was essentially > > NACK-ed for not exposing standard attributes. > > Once this provides more than GPIO capabilities i.e. becomes a proper > Multi-Function Device, then it can use the MFD framework. Until then, > it's a GPIO device I'm afraid. > > Are you going to re-author the HWMON driver to conform? hwmon cannot be reathored as it has no standard hwmon attributes. > > > The CPLD itself has PSU status-related information, bootstrap related > > information, > > various resets for the CPU-s, OOB ethernet PHY, information on the exact board > > model it's running etc. > > > > PSU and model-related info stuff is gonna be exposed via a misc driver > > in debugfs as > > we have user-space SW depending on that. > > I thought we agreed on that as v1 MFD driver was exposing those directly and > > not doing anything else. > > Yes, we agreed that creating an MFD driver just to expose chip > attributes was not an acceptable solution. > > > So I moved to use the simple I2C MFD driver, this is all modeled on the sl28cpld > > which currently uses the same driver and then GPIO regmap as I do. > > > > Other stuff like the resets is probably gonna get exposed later when > > it's required > > to control it directly. > > In order for this driver to tick the MFD box, it's going to need more > than one function. Understood, would a debug driver count or I can expose the resets via a reset driver as we have a future use for them? Regards, Robert > > > > > > .../bindings/gpio/delta,tn48m-gpio.yaml | 42 ++++++++++ > > > > > .../bindings/mfd/delta,tn48m-cpld.yaml | 81 +++++++++++++++++++ > > > > > 2 files changed, 123 insertions(+) > > > > > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/delta,tn48m-gpio.yaml > > > > > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/delta,tn48m-cpld.yaml > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Lee Jones [李琼斯] > Senior Technical Lead - Developer Services > Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs > Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog -- Robert Marko Staff Embedded Linux Engineer Sartura Ltd. Lendavska ulica 16a 10000 Zagreb, Croatia Email: robert.marko@xxxxxxxxxx Web: www.sartura.hr
