Hi Nishanth, Jan,
On 11/05/21 10:03 pm, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> On 17:26-20210511, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> [...]
>>>>> +&sdhci1 {
>>>>> + no-1-8-v;
>>>>> +};
>>>>> +
>>>>
>>>> Let's move that to k3-am65-iot2050-common.dtsi, to avoid repeating
>>>> yourself. There is already a sdhci1 extension.
>>>>
>>>
>>> The reason why I added these tags in board dts and not in the common
>>> dtsi is because if it was added in the common board then for all the iot
>>> boards this will be applicable and in future if a different version of
>>> iot boards use S.R. 2.0 then we might have to change it again.
>>
>> Yes, we will have to take care of the split-up for SR2.0-based variants.
>> I didn't have the chance study their DTs yet but I strongly suspect that
>> there will be more differences. Then we may add some
>> k3-am65-iot2050-common-{SR1,SR2}.dtsi.
>>
>> So, I would not try to refactor when not all variables are on the table yet.
>
>
> I agree with Jan. lets bring it in the current common.dtsi and see the
> sr2 introduction separately.
>
okay, I'll post a respin of this patch making this change.
Thanks,
Aswath
