On 17:26-20210511, Jan Kiszka wrote:
[...]
> >>> +&sdhci1 {
> >>> + no-1-8-v;
> >>> +};
> >>> +
> >>
> >> Let's move that to k3-am65-iot2050-common.dtsi, to avoid repeating
> >> yourself. There is already a sdhci1 extension.
> >>
> >
> > The reason why I added these tags in board dts and not in the common
> > dtsi is because if it was added in the common board then for all the iot
> > boards this will be applicable and in future if a different version of
> > iot boards use S.R. 2.0 then we might have to change it again.
>
> Yes, we will have to take care of the split-up for SR2.0-based variants.
> I didn't have the chance study their DTs yet but I strongly suspect that
> there will be more differences. Then we may add some
> k3-am65-iot2050-common-{SR1,SR2}.dtsi.
>
> So, I would not try to refactor when not all variables are on the table yet.
I agree with Jan. lets bring it in the current common.dtsi and see the
sr2 introduction separately.
--
Regards,
Nishanth Menon
Key (0xDDB5849D1736249D) / Fingerprint: F8A2 8693 54EB 8232 17A3 1A34 DDB5 849D 1736 249D
