Hi Patrice
Thanks for the reply.
On Fri, May 7, 2021 at 8:29 PM Patrice CHOTARD
<patrice.chotard@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi Dillon
>
> In order to test this patch, it's tricky to make a recent kernel running
> on stm32f429-disco as this board embeds only 8MB of SDRAM and 2MB of flash.
>
> Can you indicates us which kernel version you are using and also the kernel config please ?
Since this patch was submitted in last year, might it be 5.0? not for sure
Anyway, I will resubmit it in the recent kernel version with the kernel config
and a detailed test step for you.
Thanks for your time.
>
> Thanks
>
> Patrice
>
> On 5/7/21 4:54 AM, dillon min wrote:
> > Hi Pierre-Yves, Alain
> >
> > Could you help to take a look?
> > i really appreciate it.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Best Regards
> > Dillon
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 9:00 PM Wolfram Sang <wsa@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 08:43:54PM +0800, dillon min wrote:
> >>> Hi All,
> >>>
> >>> Just a gentle ping.
> >>
> >> Pierre-Yves?
> >>
> >>>
> >>> Regards.
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 9:27 PM <dillon.minfei@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> From: dillon min <dillon.minfei@xxxxxxxxx>
> >>>>
> >>>> as stm32f429's internal flash is 2Mbytes and compiled kernel
> >>>> image bigger than 2Mbytes, so we have to load kernel image
> >>>> to sdram on stm32f429-disco board which has 8Mbytes sdram space.
> >>>>
> >>>> based on above context, as you knows kernel running on external
> >>>> sdram is more slower than internal flash. besides, we need read 4
> >>>> bytes to get touch screen xyz(x, y, pressure) coordinate data in
> >>>> stmpe811 interrupt.
> >>>>
> >>>> so, in stm32f4_i2c_handle_rx_done, as i2c read slower than running
> >>>> in xip mode, have to adjust 'STOP/START bit set position' from last
> >>>> two bytes to last one bytes. else, will get i2c timeout in reading
> >>>> touch screen coordinate.
> >>>>
> >>>> to not take side effect, introduce IIC_LAST_BYTE_POS to support xip
> >>>> kernel or has mmu platform.
> >>>>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: dillon min <dillon.minfei@xxxxxxxxx>
> >>>> ---
> >>>>
> >>>> V4: indroduce 'IIC_LAST_BYTE_POS' to compatible with xipkernel boot
> >>>>
> >>>> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-stm32f4.c | 12 +++++++++---
> >>>> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >>>>
> >>>> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-stm32f4.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-stm32f4.c
> >>>> index d6a69dfcac3f..97cf42ae7fa0 100644
> >>>> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-stm32f4.c
> >>>> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-stm32f4.c
> >>>> @@ -93,6 +93,12 @@
> >>>> #define STM32F4_I2C_MAX_FREQ 46U
> >>>> #define HZ_TO_MHZ 1000000
> >>>>
> >>>> +#if !defined(CONFIG_MMU) && !defined(CONFIG_XIP_KERNEL)
> >>>> +#define IIC_LAST_BYTE_POS 1
> >>>> +#else
> >>>> +#define IIC_LAST_BYTE_POS 2
> >>>> +#endif
> >>>> +
> >>>> /**
> >>>> * struct stm32f4_i2c_msg - client specific data
> >>>> * @addr: 8-bit slave addr, including r/w bit
> >>>> @@ -439,7 +445,7 @@ static void stm32f4_i2c_handle_rx_done(struct stm32f4_i2c_dev *i2c_dev)
> >>>> int i;
> >>>>
> >>>> switch (msg->count) {
> >>>> - case 2:
> >>>> + case IIC_LAST_BYTE_POS:
> >>>> /*
> >>>> * In order to correctly send the Stop or Repeated Start
> >>>> * condition on the I2C bus, the STOP/START bit has to be set
> >>>> @@ -454,7 +460,7 @@ static void stm32f4_i2c_handle_rx_done(struct stm32f4_i2c_dev *i2c_dev)
> >>>> else
> >>>> stm32f4_i2c_set_bits(reg, STM32F4_I2C_CR1_START);
> >>>>
> >>>> - for (i = 2; i > 0; i--)
> >>>> + for (i = IIC_LAST_BYTE_POS; i > 0; i--)
> >>>> stm32f4_i2c_read_msg(i2c_dev);
> >>>>
> >>>> reg = i2c_dev->base + STM32F4_I2C_CR2;
> >>>> @@ -463,7 +469,7 @@ static void stm32f4_i2c_handle_rx_done(struct stm32f4_i2c_dev *i2c_dev)
> >>>>
> >>>> complete(&i2c_dev->complete);
> >>>> break;
> >>>> - case 3:
> >>>> + case (IIC_LAST_BYTE_POS+1):
> >>>> /*
> >>>> * In order to correctly generate the NACK pulse after the last
> >>>> * received data byte, we have to enable NACK before reading N-2
> >>>> --
> >>>> 2.7.4
> >>>>
> > _______________________________________________
> > Linux-stm32 mailing list
> > Linux-stm32@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > https://st-md-mailman.stormreply.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-stm32
> >
---
Best regards
Dillon,
