On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 10:46:37PM +0200, Johan Jonker wrote: > On 4/21/21 10:04 PM, Ezequiel Garcia wrote: > > Add a new compatible for the thermal sensor device on RK3568 SoCs. > > > > Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/rockchip-thermal.txt | 1 + > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/rockchip-thermal.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/rockchip-thermal.txt > > index 7f94669e9ebe..346e466c2006 100644 > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/rockchip-thermal.txt > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/rockchip-thermal.txt > > @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ Required properties: > > "rockchip,rk3328-tsadc": found on RK3328 SoCs > > "rockchip,rk3368-tsadc": found on RK3368 SoCs > > "rockchip,rk3399-tsadc": found on RK3399 SoCs > > > + "rockchip,rk3568-tsadc": found on RK3568 SoCs > > This is still a text document. > rob+dt has now scripts that check for undocumented compatibility > strings, so first convert rockchip-thermal.txt to YAML and then add this > in a separated patch. Thanks for pushing on this, but for now at least, simple compatible additions are fine. If changes would complicate the conversion to schema, then we should convert it first. For example, if the new compatible was accompanied with differing clocks, irqs, resets, etc., then we should convert (or consider a separate schema). In parallel though, we do want to get platforms to 0 undocumented (by schema) compatibles. And then 0 warnings after that... Rob
