On 4/22/21 10:38 AM, Neil Armstrong wrote:
[...]
+ port@1:
+ type: object
+ additionalProperties: false
+
+ description:
+ Video port for LVDS output (panel or bridge).
+
+ properties:
+ reg:
+ const: 1
+
+ endpoint:
+ type: object
+ additionalProperties: false
+ properties:
+ remote-endpoint: true
Similar to Jagan's serie, would be great to add bindings for the dual-link LVDS even if not supported
by the driver (the driver can fails with a verbose error).
I don't want to add any sort of bindings which I cannot validate against
real hardware. I would argue that adding the 2x single / dual link LVDS
DT property could be added when someone has a need for it and can test
it on real hardware, and such a binding should be simple develop and
add. And that is better, because we won't end up with some possibly
misdesigned untested DT binding which would become part of the ABI and
would have to be supported forever.
