On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 4:01 AM Marek Vasut <marex@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > Add DT binding document for TI SN65DSI83 and SN65DSI84 DSI to LVDS bridge. > > Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marex@xxxxxxx> > Cc: Douglas Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Jagan Teki <jagan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > To: dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > --- > V2: Add compatible string for SN65DSI84, since this is now tested on it > --- > .../bindings/display/bridge/ti,sn65dsi83.yaml | 134 ++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 134 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/ti,sn65dsi83.yaml > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/ti,sn65dsi83.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/ti,sn65dsi83.yaml > new file mode 100644 > index 000000000000..42d11b46a1eb > --- /dev/null > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/ti,sn65dsi83.yaml > @@ -0,0 +1,134 @@ > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause) > +%YAML 1.2 > +--- > +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/display/bridge/ti,sn65dsi83.yaml# > +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml# > + > +title: SN65DSI83 and SN65DSI84 DSI to LVDS bridge chip Can it possible to wait for my v4 to have dual-link LVDS supported which is quite discussing points on previous versions? Jagan.
