On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 7:57 PM Daniel Walker <danielwa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 09:04:15AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 3:46 AM Daniel Walker <danielwa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > From: Ofer Licht <olicht@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > Thanks for the submission, it's always nice to see a new platform > > > > > Define craw64 config, dts and Makefile for Cisco > > > SoCs known as Craw. > > > > I'd like some more information about the platform, e.g. the target > > market and maybe a link to the product information. > > Our SoC is produced as an internal product. So SoC specifications aren't > widely available. > > Here is an example of a Cisco product which uses this SoC, > > https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/switches/catalyst-9200-series-switches/nb-06-cat9200-ser-data-sheet-cte-en.html > > I suspect that's not really what your looking for tho. No, that's pretty much exactly what I was looking for. Just put this one sentence and the link into the patch description and it will be fine. > > > > The memory size is usually filled by the boot loader, just put an > > empty node into the .dtsi file > > Arnd, I must regretfully inform you that Cisco has a deep dark addiction to > bootloaders which, are, um, how do I say this diplomatically, um , brain dead. > > You have some other comments below related to moving things into the bootloader, > and I can look into it, but bootloader inflexibility is wide spread inside > Cisco. Ok, no worries. If the bootloader can do it right, you should do it, but this part is not essential. Arnd
