On 2014년 07월 10일 10:20, Inki Dae wrote:
> On 2014년 07월 10일 10:06, YoungJun Cho wrote:
>> On 07/10/2014 12:22 AM, Thierry Reding wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jul 08, 2014 at 09:39:38AM +0900, YoungJun Cho wrote:
>>>> To support LCD I80 interface, the DSI host calls this function
>>>> to notify the panel tearing effect synchronization signal to
>>>> the CRTC device manager to trigger to transfer video image.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: YoungJun Cho <yj44.cho@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> Acked-by: Inki Dae <inki.dae@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> Acked-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> ---
>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_dsi.c | 11 +++++++++++
>>>> include/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.h | 7 +++++++
>>>> 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_dsi.c
>>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_dsi.c
>>>> index dad543a..76e34ca 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_dsi.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_dsi.c
>>>> @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@
>>>> #include <video/mipi_display.h>
>>>> #include <video/videomode.h>
>>>>
>>>> +#include "exynos_drm_crtc.h"
>>>> #include "exynos_drm_drv.h"
>>>>
>>>> /* returns true iff both arguments logically differs */
>>>> @@ -1041,10 +1042,20 @@ static ssize_t
>>>> exynos_dsi_host_transfer(struct mipi_dsi_host *host,
>>>> return (ret < 0) ? ret : xfer.rx_done;
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> +static void exynos_dsi_host_pass_te(struct mipi_dsi_host *host)
>>>> +{
>>>> + struct exynos_dsi *dsi = host_to_dsi(host);
>>>> + struct drm_encoder *encoder = dsi->encoder;
>>>> +
>>>> + if (dsi->state & DSIM_STATE_ENABLED)
>>>> + exynos_drm_crtc_te_handler(encoder->crtc);
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> static const struct mipi_dsi_host_ops exynos_dsi_ops = {
>>>> .attach = exynos_dsi_host_attach,
>>>> .detach = exynos_dsi_host_detach,
>>>> .transfer = exynos_dsi_host_transfer,
>>>> + .pass_te = exynos_dsi_host_pass_te,
>>>> };
>>>>
>>>> static int exynos_dsi_poweron(struct exynos_dsi *dsi)
>>>> diff --git a/include/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.h b/include/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.h
>>>> index 944f33f..3f21bea 100644
>>>> --- a/include/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.h
>>>> +++ b/include/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.h
>>>> @@ -49,6 +49,12 @@ struct mipi_dsi_msg {
>>>> * @detach: detach DSI device from DSI host
>>>> * @transfer: send and/or receive DSI packet, return number of
>>>> received bytes,
>>>> * or error
>>>> + * @pass_te: call the crtc te_handler() callback from DSI host.
>>>> + * The panel generates tearing effect synchronization signal
>>>> between
>>>> + * MCU and FB to display video images. And the display
>>>> controller
>>>> + * should trigger to transfer video image at this signal. So
>>>> the panel
>>>> + * receives the TE IRQ, then calls this function to notify
>>>> it to the
>>>> + * display controller.
>>>> */
>>>> struct mipi_dsi_host_ops {
>>>> int (*attach)(struct mipi_dsi_host *host,
>>>> @@ -57,6 +63,7 @@ struct mipi_dsi_host_ops {
>>>> struct mipi_dsi_device *dsi);
>>>> ssize_t (*transfer)(struct mipi_dsi_host *host,
>>>> struct mipi_dsi_msg *msg);
>>>> + void (*pass_te)(struct mipi_dsi_host *host);
>>>
>>> I've objected to this particular change before and that objection still
>>> stands. I don't see how this is related to DSI. It seems like an
>>> implementation detail of this particular setup and I think it should be
>>> handled differently (within the Exynos DSI controller implementation
>>> possibly).
>>>
>>
>> Okay, I understand what you mean.
>> As you know, this function is called by panel TE interrupt handler, so
>> it could be accessed by panel.
>> Do you have any good idea for panel to access exynos_drm_dsi directly
>> without mipi_dis_host_ops?
>>
>
> Mr. Cho, let's just use notifier callback for the meantime: fimd driver
> registers a te handler to Exynos mipi dsi driver, and then Exynos mipi
> dsi driver calls the te handler when te interrupt occurs from Panel device.
>
Again, there was my missing point. there wouldn't be way that Exynos
mipi dsi driver can receive te signal from panel without mipi_dsi_host_ops.
So let's use remote-endpoint property of DSI device node. DSI driver can
get te gpio from Panel node, and can register te irq handler in case of
i80 Panel. After that, te signal could be notified from te interrupt
handler of DSI driver to FIMD driver through notifier callback
registered already.
Thanks,
Inki Dae
> I think all we can consider for it is to use mipi_dsi_host_ops or core
> framework - connector/encoder and crtc. However, it seems that it's not
> really easy for we have a consensus with other maintainers until other
> i80 users appear and they need common something for it.
>
>
> Thanks,
> Inki Dae
>
>> Thank you.
>> Best regards YJ
>>
>>> Laurent also asked you to split this up into two patches, one for the
>>> core part, the other for the Exynos driver parts, yet this patch
>>> contains both changes.
>>>
>>> Thierry
>>>
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> dri-devel mailing list
> dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
