On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 9:24 PM Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Sun, Mar 7, 2021 at 8:18 PM Anup Patel <anup@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Sat, Mar 6, 2021 at 4:52 AM Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > On Sun, Feb 21, 2021 at 03:07:57PM +0530, Anup Patel wrote: > > > > The RISC-V CPU idle states will be described in DT under the > > > > /cpus/riscv-idle-states DT node. This patch adds the bindings > > > > documentation for riscv-idle-states DT nodes and idle state DT > > > > nodes under it. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Anup Patel <anup.patel@xxxxxxx> > > > > --- > > > > .../bindings/riscv/idle-states.yaml | 250 ++++++++++++++++++ > > > > 1 file changed, 250 insertions(+) > > > > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/idle-states.yaml > > > > > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/idle-states.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/idle-states.yaml > > > > new file mode 100644 > > > > index 000000000000..3eff763fed23 > > > > --- /dev/null > > > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/idle-states.yaml > > > > @@ -0,0 +1,250 @@ > > > > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause) > > > > +%YAML 1.2 > > > > +--- > > > > +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/riscv/idle-states.yaml# > > > > +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml# > > > > + > > > > +title: RISC-V idle states binding description > > > > + > > > > +maintainers: > > > > + - Anup Patel <anup.patel@xxxxxxx> > > > > + > > > > +description: |+ > > > > + RISC-V systems can manage power consumption dynamically, where HARTs > > > > + (or CPUs) [1] can be put in different platform specific suspend (or > > > > + idle) states (ranging from simple WFI, power gating, etc). The RISC-V > > > > + SBI [2] hart state management extension provides a standard mechanism > > > > + for OSes to request HART state transitions. > > > > + > > > > + The platform specific suspend (or idle) states of a hart can be either > > > > + retentive or non-rententive in nature. A retentive suspend state will > > > > + preserve hart register and CSR values for all privilege modes whereas > > > > + a non-retentive suspend state will not preserve hart register and CSR > > > > + values. The suspend (or idle) state entered by executing the WFI > > > > + instruction is considered standard on all RISC-V systems and therefore > > > > + must not be listed in device tree. > > > > + > > > > + The device tree binding definition for RISC-V idle states described > > > > + in this document is quite similar to the ARM idle states [3]. > > > > + > > > > + References > > > > + > > > > + [1] RISC-V Linux Kernel documentation - CPUs bindings > > > > + Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/cpus.yaml > > > > + > > > > + [2] RISC-V Supervisor Binary Interface (SBI) > > > > + http://github.com/riscv/riscv-sbi-doc/riscv-sbi.adoc > > > > + > > > > + [3] ARM idle states binding description - Idle states bindings > > > > + Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/idle-states.yaml > > > > > > I'd assume there's common parts we can share. > > > > Yes, except few properties most are the same. > > > > We can have a shared DT bindings for both ARM and RISC-V but > > both architectures will always have some architecture specific details > > (or properties) which need to be documented under arch specific > > DT documentation. Is it okay if this is done as a separate series ? > > No... Okay, I will create a common DT bindings for both ARM and RISC-V in the next revision. > > > > > + > > > > +properties: > > > > + $nodename: > > > > + const: riscv-idle-states > > > > > > Just 'idle-states' like Arm. > > > > I had tried "idle-states" node name but DT bindings check complaints > > conflict with ARM idle state bindings. > > ...and this being one reason why. > > Actually, I think this can all be in 1 doc if you want. It's fine with > me if a common doc has RiscV and Arm specific properties. Sure, will add common DT bindings. > > > > > + > > > > +patternProperties: > > > > + "^(cpu|cluster)-": > > > > + type: object > > > > + description: | > > > > + Each state node represents an idle state description and must be > > > > + defined as follows. > > > > + > > > > > > additionalProperties: false > > > > okay, will update. > > > > > > > > > + properties: > > > > + compatible: > > > > + const: riscv,idle-state > > > > + > > > > + local-timer-stop: > > > > + description: > > > > + If present the CPU local timer control logic is lost on state > > > > + entry, otherwise it is retained. > > > > + type: boolean > > > > + > > > > + entry-latency-us: > > > > + description: > > > > + Worst case latency in microseconds required to enter the idle state. > > > > + > > > > + exit-latency-us: > > > > + description: > > > > + Worst case latency in microseconds required to exit the idle state. > > > > + The exit-latency-us duration may be guaranteed only after > > > > + entry-latency-us has passed. > > > > + > > > > + min-residency-us: > > > > + description: > > > > + Minimum residency duration in microseconds, inclusive of preparation > > > > + and entry, for this idle state to be considered worthwhile energy > > > > + wise (refer to section 2 of this document for a complete description). > > > > + > > > > + wakeup-latency-us: > > > > + description: | > > > > + Maximum delay between the signaling of a wake-up event and the CPU > > > > + being able to execute normal code again. If omitted, this is assumed > > > > + to be equal to: > > > > + > > > > + entry-latency-us + exit-latency-us > > > > + > > > > + It is important to supply this value on systems where the duration > > > > + of PREP phase (see diagram 1, section 2) is non-neglibigle. In such > > > > + systems entry-latency-us + exit-latency-us will exceed > > > > + wakeup-latency-us by this duration. > > > > + > > > > + idle-state-name: > > > > + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/string > > > > + description: > > > > + A string used as a descriptive name for the idle state. > > > > + > > > > + required: > > > > + - compatible > > > > + - entry-latency-us > > > > + - exit-latency-us > > > > + - min-residency-us > > > > + > > > > +additionalProperties: false > > > > I will move this up. > > TBC, you need this at 2 levels. Both the idle-states node and child nodes. Sure, I will add at both levels. Regards, Anup
