> Hi! > > On 09.03.21 06:56, Kuldeep Singh wrote: > > Hi Heiko, > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Heiko Schocher <hs@xxxxxxx> > >> Sent: Tuesday, March 9, 2021 11:01 AM > >> To: linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > >> Cc: Heiko Schocher <hs@xxxxxxx>; Ashish Kumar <ashish.kumar@xxxxxxx>; > >> Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>; Rob Herring <robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx>; > >> Yogesh Gaur <yogeshgaur.83@xxxxxxxxx>; devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; > >> linux- kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-spi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > >> Subject: [EXT] [PATCH v2 2/4] dt-bindings: spi: add compatible entry > >> for imx8mp in FlexSPI controller > >> > >> Caution: EXT Email > >> > >> add compatible entry "nxp,imx8mp-fspi" in NXP FlexSPI controller > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Heiko Schocher <hs@xxxxxxx> > >> --- > >> > >> (no changes since v1) > >> > >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-nxp-fspi.txt | 1 + > >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > >> > >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-nxp-fspi.txt > >> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-nxp-fspi.txt > >> index 7ac60d9fe3571..fd5f081f6d91b 100644 > >> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-nxp-fspi.txt > >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-nxp-fspi.txt > >> @@ -4,6 +4,7 @@ Required properties: > >> - compatible : Should be "nxp,lx2160a-fspi" > >> "nxp,imx8qxp-fspi" > >> "nxp,imx8mm-fspi" > >> + "nxp,imx8mp-fspi" > > > > It seems the changes are not on top of tree. Please see[1] for latest changes > including imx8dxl entry. > > Snippet below: > > > > Required properties: > > - compatible : Should be "nxp,lx2160a-fspi" > > "nxp,imx8qxp-fspi" > > "nxp,imx8mm-fspi" > > "nxp,imx8dxl-fspi" > > My patches are based on mainline.. > * 144c79ef33536 - (origin/master, origin/HEAD) Merge tag 'perf-tools-fixes-for- > v5.12-2020-03-07' > of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/acme/linux (vor 32 Stunden) > <Linus Torvalds> > > Should I post this patch rebased on [1] or may all patches rebased on [1] ? Hi Heiko, As per cover letter, I can identify that first two are driver/Documentation patches and other two are device-tree patches. Device-tree patches(3/4 and 4/4) will go via Shawn tree (git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/shawnguo/linux.git) And initial two driver patches(1/4 and 2/4) will go via Mark's tree (git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/spi.git) One approach I can think of is to send driver patches first and later send device-tree patches mentioning dependency on first two patches. Maybe Mark can comment here if he has any other opinion. Thanks Kuldeep
