On Mon, 2021-03-08 at 17:22 +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > Hi Arnd and Olof, > > This is just a resend of previous patch. Since I did not get replies > from Intel maintainers, I assume this could go via soc tree directly. I think the to/cc list is missing Dinh, the socfpga maintainer: Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@xxxxxxxxxx> I already acked the only patch I could review, i.e.: dt-bindings: arm: intel,keembay: limit the dtschema to root node Regards, Daniele > > Best regards, > Krzysztof > > > Krzysztof Kozlowski (10): > dt-bindings: arm: intel,keembay: limit the dtschema to root node > arm64: dts: intel: socfpga: override clocks by label > arm64: dts: intel: socfpga_agilex: move clocks out of soc node > arm64: dts: intel: socfpga_agilex: move timer out of soc node > arm64: dts: intel: socfpga_agilex: remove default status=okay > arm64: dts: intel: socfpga_agilex: move usbphy out of soc node > arm64: dts: intel: socfpga_agilex: use defined for GIC interrupts > arm64: dts: intel: socfpga_agilex: align node names with dtschema > arm64: dts: intel: socfpga_agilex_socdk: align LED node names with > dtschema > arm64: dts: intel: socfpga_agilex_socdk_nand: align LED node names > with dtschema > > .../bindings/arm/intel,keembay.yaml | 2 + > arch/arm64/boot/dts/intel/socfpga_agilex.dtsi | 222 ++++++++++---- > ---- > .../boot/dts/intel/socfpga_agilex_socdk.dts | 18 +- > .../dts/intel/socfpga_agilex_socdk_nand.dts | 18 +- > .../boot/dts/intel/socfpga_n5x_socdk.dts | 12 +- > 5 files changed, 144 insertions(+), 128 deletions(-) >
