On 07.03.2021 18:04, Ansuel Smith wrote:
On Mon, Mar 08, 2021 at 10:48:32AM +0100, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
On 16.02.2021 22:26, Ansuel Smith wrote:
Document nvmem-partitions compatible used to treat mtd partitions as a
nvmem provider.
I'm just wondering if "nvmem-partitions" is accurate enough. Partitions
bit sounds a bit ambiguous in the mtd context.
What do you think about "mtd-nvmem-cells" or just "nvmem-cells"?
I read somewhere that mtd is not so standard so "nvmem-cells" should be the
right compatible.
To sum up, with v2 I should change the compatible name and just push the
2 and 3 patch. (waiting your fix to be accepted) Correct?
I'm also quite sure you're fine to send V2 now, if you just let
maintainers know (e.g. in a comment below a --- tear line) that it
depends on the:
[PATCH] mtd: parsers: ofpart: limit parsing of deprecated DT syntax
In other words: you don't need to wait for my patch to get accepted.
