On Mon, Mar 08, 2021 at 10:48:32AM +0100, Rafał Miłecki wrote: > On 16.02.2021 22:26, Ansuel Smith wrote: > > Document nvmem-partitions compatible used to treat mtd partitions as a > > nvmem provider. > > I'm just wondering if "nvmem-partitions" is accurate enough. Partitions > bit sounds a bit ambiguous in the mtd context. > > What do you think about "mtd-nvmem-cells" or just "nvmem-cells"? I read somewhere that mtd is not so standard so "nvmem-cells" should be the right compatible. To sum up, with v2 I should change the compatible name and just push the 2 and 3 patch. (waiting your fix to be accepted) Correct?
