> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wood Scott-B07421
> Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2014 3:00 AM
> To: Jain Priyanka-B32167
> Cc: devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linuxppc-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] devicetree/bindings/powerpc/fsl: Add binding for
> board
>
> On Mon, 2014-07-07 at 14:06 +0530, Priyanka Jain wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Priyanka Jain <Priyanka.Jain@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > .../devicetree/bindings/powerpc/fsl/board.txt | 17
> ++++++++++++++++-
> > 1 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/powerpc/fsl/board.txt
> > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/powerpc/fsl/board.txt
> > index f35f295..7800729 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/powerpc/fsl/board.txt
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/powerpc/fsl/board.txt
> > @@ -1,8 +1,23 @@
> > Freescale Reference Board Bindings
> >
> > -This document describes device tree bindings for various devices that
> > +This document describes device tree bindings for board and various
> > +devices that
> > exist on some Freescale reference boards.
> >
> > +* Board node
> > +Required properties:
> > +
> > + - model : Should be "fsl,<board>"
> > + - compatible : Should be "fsl,<board>"
> > + example: "fsl,T1040RDB", "fsl,T1042RDB", "fsl,T1042RDB_PI"
> > + "fsl,T1040QDS", "fsl,T1042QDS"
> > +
> > +Example:
> > +
> > +/ {
> > + model = "fsl,T1040RDB";
> > + compatible = "fsl,T1040RDB";
> > +};
>
> We really don't need to do this for every board just to satisfy
> checkpatch.
>
> -Scott
>
[Jain Priyanka-B32167] Is it OK to submit a patch with board checkpatch warning for this case ?
��.n��������+%������w��{.n����z�{��ܨ}���Ơz�j:+v�����w����ޙ��&�)ߡ�a����z�ޗ���ݢj��w�f
