On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 08:16:30AM +0100, Oleksij Rempel wrote: > Hi William, > > On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 10:48:56AM +0900, William Breathitt Gray wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 09:13:54AM +0100, Oleksij Rempel wrote: > > > changes v6: > > > - rename it to interrupt-counter > > > > Hi Oleksij, > > > > Sorry to nitpick again, I think "irq-counter" as Jonathan suggested in > > an earlier review would be a better name afterall. Would you be able to > > rename this driver to use that name instead? > > I would prefer not to rename it. IRQ (Interrupt Request) is a signal > outside of the system. Below some frequency rate, amount of counted > ISR (interrupt service routine) calls or events would be equal to the actual > IRQs. If frequency is too high, we will count ISR, but not IRQs. In > any case, interrupt-counter is more or leas neutral, without triggering > too many wrong assumptions. > > Regards, > Oleksij > -- > Pengutronix e.K. | | > Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | > 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | > Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | I suppose "interrupt-counter" should be fine in this context then, so perhaps a rename isn't really necessary afterall. William Breathitt Gray
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
