On Fri, Feb 5, 2021 at 10:27 PM Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 05, 2021 at 02:57:27PM +0800, Shengjiu Wang wrote: > > > + /* TYPE C is notification from M core */ > > + if (r_msg->header.type == MSG_TYPE_C) { > > + if (r_msg->header.cmd == TX_PERIOD_DONE) { > > > + } else if (r_msg->header.cmd == RX_PERIOD_DONE) { > > A switch statement would be clearer and more extensible... > > > + /* TYPE B is response msg */ > > + if (r_msg->header.type == MSG_TYPE_B) { > > + memcpy(&info->r_msg, r_msg, sizeof(struct rpmsg_r_msg)); > > + complete(&info->cmd_complete); > > + } > > ...and make this flow clearer for example. Do we need to warn on > unknown messages? Thanks for reviewing. I will update them. Best regards wang shengjiu