On Fri, Feb 05, 2021 at 02:57:27PM +0800, Shengjiu Wang wrote:
> + /* TYPE C is notification from M core */
> + if (r_msg->header.type == MSG_TYPE_C) {
> + if (r_msg->header.cmd == TX_PERIOD_DONE) {
> + } else if (r_msg->header.cmd == RX_PERIOD_DONE) {
A switch statement would be clearer and more extensible...
> + /* TYPE B is response msg */
> + if (r_msg->header.type == MSG_TYPE_B) {
> + memcpy(&info->r_msg, r_msg, sizeof(struct rpmsg_r_msg));
> + complete(&info->cmd_complete);
> + }
...and make this flow clearer for example. Do we need to warn on
unknown messages?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
