On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 12:11:05PM +0530, Prasanna Vengateshan wrote: > + spi-max-frequency: > + maximum: 50000000 And it actually works at 50 MHz? Cool. > + > + reset-gpios: > + description: Optional gpio specifier for a reset line > + maxItems: 1 > + > +required: > + - compatible > + - reg > + > +unevaluatedProperties: false > + > +examples: > + - | > + #include <dt-bindings/gpio/gpio.h> > + > + //Ethernet switch connected via spi to the host, CPU port wired to eth1 > + eth1 { So if you do bother to add the DSA master in the example, can this be ð1 so that we could associate with the phandle below? > + #address-cells = <1>; > + #size-cells = <0>; > + > + fixed-link { > + speed = <1000>; > + full-duplex; > + }; > + }; > + > + spi1 { Is this a label or a node name? spi1 or spi@1? > + #address-cells = <1>; > + #size-cells = <0>; > + pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_spi_ksz>; > + cs-gpios = <0>, <0>, <0>, <&pioC 28 0>; > + id = <1>; I know this is the SPI controller and thus mostly irrelevant, but what is "id = <1>"? > + > + lan9374: switch@0 { > + compatible = "microchip,lan9374"; > + reg = <0>; > + > + spi-max-frequency = <44000000>; > + > + ethernet-ports { > + #address-cells = <1>; > + #size-cells = <0>; > + port@0 { > + reg = <0>; > + label = "lan1"; > + }; > + port@1 { > + reg = <1>; > + label = "lan2"; > + }; > + port@2 { > + reg = <7>; reg should match node index (port@2), here and everywhere below. As for the net device labels, I'm not sure if the mismatch is deliberate there. > + label = "lan3"; > + }; > + port@3 { > + reg = <2>; > + label = "lan4"; > + }; > + port@4 { > + reg = <6>; > + label = "lan5"; > + }; > + port@5 { > + reg = <3>; > + label = "lan6"; > + }; > + port@6 { > + reg = <4>; > + label = "cpu"; label for CPU port is not needed/used. > + ethernet = <ð1>; > + fixed-link { > + speed = <1000>; > + full-duplex; > + }; > + }; > + port@7 { > + reg = <5>; > + label = "lan7"; > + fixed-link { > + speed = <1000>; > + full-duplex; > + }; > + }; > + }; > + }; > + };