On 06:49-20210122, Nishanth Menon wrote: > On Thu, 21 Jan 2021 11:33:05 +0530, Lokesh Vutla wrote: > > With dtc 1.6.0, building TI device-tree files with W=2 results in warnings > > like below for all interrupt controllers. > > > > /bus@100000/bus@30000000/interrupt-controller1: Missing #address-cells in interrupt provider > > > > Fix these by adding #address-cells = <0>; for all interrupt controllers in > > TI device-tree files. Any other #address-cells value is really only needed > > if interrupt-map property is being used (which is not the case for existing > > TI device-tree files) > > Hi Lokesh Vutla, > > I have applied the following to branch ti-k3-next on [1]. > Thank you! > > [1/1] arm64: dts: ti: k3: squelch warnings regarding no #address-cells for interrupt-controller > commit: 73d0af633c4bed02f8e71658c9e25ac8250b08c4 > > > All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next > tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent up the chain during > the next merge window (or sooner if it is a relevant bug fix), however if > problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted. [...] Lokesh, Based on discussion on [1] - looks like #address-cells = 0 usage is still to be resolved and needs some alignment between Andre and Rob on where to take this (dtc fixups to handle this Vs explicit #address-cells = 0 and increase in dtb size). I propose we drop this patch rather than having to revert this at a later point after I send a PR. Anyone has any objections? [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20210126163839.57491132@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ -- Regards, Nishanth Menon Key (0xDDB5849D1736249D) / Fingerprint: F8A2 8693 54EB 8232 17A3 1A34 DDB5 849D 1736 249D
