On Mon 25 Jan 08:51 CST 2021, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote: > Il 25/01/21 11:40, Hans Verkuil ha scritto: > > On 18/01/2021 18:45, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote: > > > Il 18/01/21 18:21, Stanimir Varbanov ha scritto: > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/core.c b/drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/core.c [..] > > > > > + .fwname = "qcom/venus-4.4/venus.mdt", [..] > > This patch can't be merged unless there is a corresponding firmware available > > in linux-firmware. Is the current 4.2 firmware in linux-firmware signed by > > Qualcomm? Can they provided 4.4 firmware as well? > > > > If there is such issue, then maybe we should do "something" about it: I > would then propose to remove all references to fwname and just get this > done in DT, where every qcom board already specifies its own path for > its own firmware. > We have the same problem with production devices on e.g. SDM845, where the firmware referenced by fw_name and present in linux-firmware won't work on any real devices. As such, providing means for specifying the firmware name in DT would be a very reasonable thing, and in line with how we handle this in other subsystems (using the firmware-name property, containing the full relative path). Regards, Bjorn
